SaferEngineer — Functional Safety Accelerator

The Problem

Why safety programs never catch a break

Every safety team faces the same four failure modes. They compound each other — and they don't resolve by adding more engineers.

01 —

It starts late. Or doesn't start.

SW and design engineers hold the critical inputs. When they're busy with the next release, safety work waits. Analysis never begins — or starts on the wrong foundation.

Dependency Bottleneck

02 —

Preparation consumes everything.

Gathering specs, parsing code, extracting BOM from schematics, calculating FIT rates — 80% of the time is preparation before any real safety judgment begins.

Resource Drain

03 —

Re-review eats what's left.

Inconsistencies across documents. Missed traceability links. Findings in confirmation review that trace back to square one. Each loop costs weeks you don't have.

Verification Loop

04 —

Nobody wants the documentation.

FMEDA tables. Assessment reports. Impact analysis matrices. The work is necessary — but it's repetitive, error-prone, and no engineer celebrates doing it.

Documentation Burden

Our Competency

Deep functional safety.
AI-accelerated execution.

Our core is functional safety — ISO 26262, IEC 61508, ISO 13849. Not software tools. Not templates. Hands-on engineering experience across 100+ approved safety cases in automotive and robotics.

On top of that foundation we layer AI tooling built internally, trained on real project patterns — automating the preparation work that burns your team's capacity before real analysis even begins.

The result: your organization moves faster without the bottleneck of finding, briefing, and waiting on scarce safety experts.

ISO 26262 IEC 61508 ISO 13849 ASIL D HARA FMEA / FTA FMEDA DFA Safety Case Assessment AI-in-the-Loop DevSafeOps

Senior FuSa Expertise First

Every engagement is led by a senior functional safety engineer — not a project manager coordinating junior resources. 100+ safety case approvals across Korea, Germany, and the USA.

AI Tooling, Not AI Promises

Our LLM-based tools are built and operated internally. They handle failure mode proposal, BOM extraction, FIT calculation, consistency checking, and impact scoping — not generic chatbot output.

We Remove Bottlenecks, Not Replace Engineers

We slot into your existing workflow. Your engineers keep judgment and sign-off authority. We handle the preparation burden that currently makes safety work feel impossible at pace.

Embedded, Not Outsourced

We work as a long-term partner — coaching your team, refining your procedures, building internal capability while delivering safety case-ready outputs from day one.

How We Work

Two modes. One outcome: safety case release-ready.

Depending on what your organization needs, we operate as an embedded partner or as an accelerating toolset — or both.

—

Mode A

Expert Engagement

Mode B

AI Accelerator

What

We join your program as a senior FuSa engineer

Co-author safety plans, manage the safety lifecycle, run analysis from HARA to confirmation review

We deploy AI tooling into your workflow

Automate preparation: BOM extraction, FIT calc, failure mode proposals, consistency checks, impact scoping

Who

Teams with resource gaps or schedule pressure

You have engineers — but not enough senior FuSa capacity to move at program pace

Teams drowning in manual preparation work

Your experts exist — but spend 80% of time gathering inputs, not making safety decisions

Output

Safety case, HARA, FMEA/FMEDA, assessment reports

Signed, audit-defensible, delivered to your OEM's template

Initialised analyses ready for expert review

AI-generated first-pass + structured finding reports your engineers validate and sign off

Time

Engagement start within 1 week

No lengthy procurement cycles. We scope, propose, and begin.

Tool deployment in days, not months

On-premise or secure managed. No IT transformation required.

Services

What we deliver — specifically.

Everything below is work we execute, not frameworks we hand you. Click each area to see exactly what's included.

We structure and maintain the functional safety lifecycle from item definition through release. This means writing and owning the safety plan, tracking all safety activities against schedule, and ensuring the safety case is complete and defensible for confirmation review. We coordinate across hardware, software, and system teams so the safety argument holds together.

Safety Plan Safety Case Lifecycle Tracking Release Readiness Report

We manage formal assessments and confirmation reviews — both preparing your team and conducting the review itself. Our AI-assisted approach automatically maps review criteria to work products, checks consistency across your repository, and generates structured finding reports before the expert even opens a document. This eliminates last-minute scrambles and repeat-loop findings.

Assessment Report Confirmation Review Package AI-generated Finding Report Consistency Matrix

Every design change triggers the question: what else is affected in the safety case? We auto-compare the change against the existing safety case, identify impacted work products, and generate impact analysis reports in your customer's template — so your team never over-scopes or under-scopes a change and finds out which at audit.

Change Impact Report Work Product Traceability Update Re-verification Scope Definition

We classify and qualify software tools and hardware components according to ISO 26262 Part 8 and IEC 61508. This includes confidence argumentation for AI-assisted workflows — ensuring your toolchain is defensible under audit, including the AI tools you use in your own development process.

Tool Classification Report Qualification Plan & Report HW Component Qualification AI Tool Confidence Argument

We run HARA from scratch or accelerate your existing process with AI tooling. Our system integrates NLP and vehicle dynamics simulation to analyze hazardous situations at scale — automatically matching Severity, Exposure, and Controllability values and proposing quantitative ASIL results. A senior engineer validates every ASIL assignment and safety goal formulation.

HARA Document Safety Goals ASIL Assignment Functional Safety Requirements

We read your SW architecture and code, propose failure modes, preventive/detective actions, and cascading cause-effect chains — automatically. RPN is auto-rated. Freedom from Interference is verified across ASIL boundaries. Your engineers validate logic and sign off. No more waiting for SW architects to be available before analysis can begin.

SW FMEA Table Failure Mode Catalogue FFI Verification Report Safety Mechanism Mapping

The full FMEDA pipeline — schematic to BOM extraction, datasheet lookup, derating, FIT rate calculation (IEC 62380 / IEC 61709 / SN 29500), FMEDA population, failure effect mapping per Safety Goal, and Safety Mechanism DC coverage — is automated. A senior engineer verifies accuracy and diagnostic coverage rationale before release.

FMEDA Table FIT Rate Calculations DC Coverage Argument SPFM / LFM Metrics

We construct fault trees from your system architecture, tracing failure propagation paths from top-level safety goals to hardware component failure modes. Quantitative FTA verifies ASIL hardware requirements. We identify single-point failures, common-cause failures, and latent faults — and map them to your safety mechanisms.

Fault Tree Diagrams Quantitative FTA Results Single-Point Failure ID Common Cause Analysis

We perform Dependent Failure Analysis to identify common cause and cascading failure modes that violate ASIL independence requirements. DFA results feed directly into your safety concept and architectural decisions — particularly for ASIL decomposition and Freedom from Interference arguments.

DFA Report Independence Argument ASIL Decomposition Validation

We develop the Functional Safety Concept and Technical Safety Concept from your HARA outputs. This includes deriving functional and technical safety requirements, designing safety mechanisms, specifying safe states, and structuring the safety architecture to meet ASIL targets. We use your existing spec and architecture as input — generating first drafts you refine, not blank sheets.

Functional Safety Concept Technical Safety Concept Safety Requirements (FSR / TSR) Safe State Specification

Proven Results

Real projects. Real numbers.

We measure contribution in hours saved and findings avoided — not in decks delivered.

70%

Efficiency Gain · HARA

Korean major Tier 1 Supplier · Chassis Products · ISO 26262 · 2023–24

"Heebeom and his team developed a highly practical semi-automated hazard analysis tool powered by AI. The tool enabled us to analyze a wide range of hazardous situations with greater speed and objectivity. His contribution greatly improved the quality and consistency of our hazard analysis process."

Senior Functional Safety Engineer · Korean major Tier 1 Supplier · 2025

HARAASIL JustificationVehicle DynamicsExcel Automation

69%

Analysis Efficiency · ASIL D

Major Global ASIL D Tier 1 Supplier · USA & EU · ISO 26262 · 3yr+ engagement

"Overall analysis efficiency improved by 69.1%. The number of Re-Verification Reviews was significantly reduced. Overall consistency increased, while the number of engineering work products and findings decreased."

Safety Lead · ASIL D Products · 2025

FMEDAAssessmentConfirmation ReviewSafety CaseMCU Safety Manual

Safety programs fail at the
intersection of technical depth
and organizational capacity.

Why safety programs never catch a break

Deep functional safety.
AI-accelerated execution.

Two modes. One outcome: safety case release-ready.

What we deliver — specifically.

Real projects. Real numbers.

Your project.
Faster. More accurate.
Safety Case-ready.

Safety programs fail at the intersection of technical depth and organizational capacity.

Why safety programs never catch a break

Deep functional safety.AI-accelerated execution.

Two modes. One outcome: safety case release-ready.

What we deliver — specifically.

Real projects. Real numbers.

Your project.Faster. More accurate.Safety Case-ready.

Safety programs fail at the
intersection of technical depth
and organizational capacity.

Deep functional safety.
AI-accelerated execution.

Your project.
Faster. More accurate.
Safety Case-ready.